Questions should have been asked:-

1-In view of the $30 billion given annually to the FBI, the CIA and other U.S. ‘intelligence’ agencies, why were these agencies completely unaware (or so they say) of this plot before they saw its results on CNN? why has this apparent failure been rewarded with yet more billions?

2-The four AA and UA jets took off with an average occupancy rate of 27%. That four airliners from major airlines leaving from the East Coast around 9 a.m. on a weekday for the West Coast would all have such low occupancy rates is highly unlikely. Was the booking system tampered with in order to ensure such low occupancy rates.

3-Why would hijackers intending to crash planes into the WTC hijack jets taking off from Boston rather than from someplace closer such as JFK Airport in New York?

4-Why would hijackers intending to crash a plane into the Pentagon, hijack a jet from Dulles Airport near Washington DC (and thus close to the Pentagon) and allow it to fly for 40 minutes away from its target before turning around and flying another 40 minutes back to it (knowing that interception by military jets during this time would in normal conditions have been very likely)?

5-What was the actual size of the entrance hole made by the object which hit the Pentagon? Is it not the case that photo evidence reveals that it was in fact at most, just a few meters in diameter, much too small to have been made by a Boeing 757 jet, but just the right size for a missile, or a Global Hawk a robotized air craft?

6-Why no aircraft fragments recovered from the Pentagon crash site? No Boeing 757 fragments, no remains of the approximately sixty passengers and crew on the jet which allegedly hit the Pentagon returned to relatives for burial?

7- AA Flight 77 (the jet which allegedly crashed into the Pentagon) was allegedly hijacked at about 9 a.m., at about the same time as the Twin Tower impacts, and its change of course back toward Washington, or its transponder having been turned off, would have been known to flight controllers, who were aware of the impacts; why, then, were U.S. Air Force jets not scrambled to intercept AA Flight 77 forty minutes before it (allegedly) hit the Pentagon, when there were U.S. Air Force jets at seven sites, normally ready to take off at ten minutes' notice?

8- Why their was no 757 airplane debris or human remains at the pentagon, which would have equaled 64 tons of debris and passenger material?

9- Why the pictures that the pentagon released for the explosion don’t show an airplane hitting the pentagon?

10- Why the pentagon lied about not having any pictures of the explosion of the pentagon?

11- Is it a coincidence, that the supposedly flight 77, hit the empty part of the pentagon, which was under renovation?

12-Why the FAA, the FBI, the CIA and NSA refusing to release any transcripts of communications from the four doomed Boeings on September 11th or any records at all relating to signals of any form transmitted by those jets?

13- why all 7 buildings of the World Trade Center complex collapsed, even though 2 building only got attacked, even though they ware relatively far from the two main buildings?

14- Why all the 7 buildings caught fire, even though they ware relatively far from the two main buildings?

15- why they claim that the buildings collapsed because of the fire, even though fires never in history destroyed a steel frame building?

16-how did a few little fires cuse building 7 to crumble? Fire never destroyed a steal building? 

17- the Word Trade Canters Towers were built by the taxpayers and it was owned by the government until July 24, 2001, where it was leased for 99 years for Larry Silverstein, that’s less than 2 months before they got destroyed, is that a coincidence?

18-Where are the black boxes (the flight data recorders and the cockpit voice recorders) from all four jets? These black boxes are designed to survive any crash. Have they been examined by experts from the National Transportation Safety Board, the agency which normally investigates airplane crashes? If not, why not?

19-In particular, what is on the FDR and the CVR from UA Flight 93, the jet which crashed in Pennsylvania? Why, exactly, did this jet crash? Was it shot down?

20- How did the so called terrorists fined their way to the world trade center and to the Pentagon, from high altitude, above the clouds? Experts fined it hard to do without help from the ground!

21- How could some one with no skills able to fly into a small target on a very high speed? Experts can’t do it.

22- How could pilots give up the cockpits so easily to a couple of gays with cardboard box opener plaids?

23- Why the pilots did not send any kind of a distress signal call?

24- Why their was no witnesses to flight 77 that supposedly have crashed into the pentagon, in a bright day light in a very densely populated aria?

25- Where are the remains of the passengers and crew?

26-"Workers at Indian Lake Marina [six miles from the place where UA Flight 93 crashed] said that they saw a cloud of confetti-like debris descend on the lake and nearby farms minutes after hearing the explosion that signaled the crash [or the attack on the jet] at 10:06 a.m. Tuesday." (Pittsburg Post Gazette, Sept. 13, 2001) If this plane was not shot down, but rather remained intact until hitting the ground, how could this debris travel the six miles from the crash site to Indian Lake in minutes when there was only a 10 mph wind blowing? (For wind-borne debris to travel six miles in, say, six minutes requires a 60 mph wind.)

27-Were the conversations between the pilots of the other three hijacked planes and air traffic controllers recorded? If so, what did those pilots say? Were those recordings seized by the FBI? Were (alleged) transcripts given by the FBI to the mainstream media? Were those transcripts fabricated to provide false evidence in support of the "Arab hijackers" story?

28- Who was focusing his camera on the North Tower at the time of impact, which was the source of the transmission of the North Tower impact which George W. Bush says he saw before he went into the classroom in Florida? Why did he do nothing (except continue listening to a little girl's story about a Goat, and about a Calf that went mad) for half an hour after he was informed that the second jet hit the South Tower (and that America was "under attack")? Did Bush have prior knowledge of the WTC attack?

29- Why the Video of the first tower getting hit is being suppressed out of the media?

30-Considering that all persons on board all four planes died, how did the FBI come up so quickly with a list of names of the alleged nineteen Arab hijackers - including aliases used by fourteen of them, in some cases seven aliases (see the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 2001-09-27)? (some of those 19 actualy still allive, they just hapen to loose there pasports when they came to the US), Why there were no Arab names on the passenger lists at all? Did the FBI prepare in advance a list of the names (and aliases) of the (alleged) "Arab hijackers" on those flights?

31-Why did the South Tower collapse first, 56 minutes after it was hit, rather than the North Tower (which was hit first and collapsed 1 hour and 44 minutes after being hit), even though the fire in the North Tower (the alleged cause of the collapse) was more intense?

32-If the outer perimeter walls of the Twin Towers were connected to the central cores only by lightweight trusses, how was wind load on the towers transmitted to the central core (as it must have been because the floors did not buckle in a strong wind)?

33-What exactly was the nature of the structural connections between the outer perimeter wall and the central core of the two towers? Is it not false that this consisted only of lightweight flimsy trusses? Is it not the case that the connection was actually made with 32,000 tons of steel beams?

34-Why are the architect's plans of the Twin Towers not publicly available?

35-Would jet fuel burning in an enclosed space (with little oxygen available for combustion) actually produce temperatures high enough (1538°C, i.e. 2800°F) to melt massive steel beams enclosed in concrete in just 56 minutes? If so, wouldn't the Twin Towers have buckled and bent, and toppled over onto the surrounding buildings in the Lower Manhattan financial district, rather than collapsing neatly upon themselves in the manner of a controlled demolition?

36-Were the Twin Towers re-engineered in the mid-1990s to make possible a collapse-on-demand if that were judged necessary? Was FEMA aware of this? Do blueprints of the Twin Towers in the possession of the past owners reveal any evidence of this?

37-Why were such huge quantities of ash and dust produced? How could fire convert concrete into dust? Has the ash been chemically analyzed to determine what it really is and how it might have been produced?

38-Is it not the case that the Twin Towers collapsed, not because of airliner impacts and fires, but because they were expertly demolished?

39-Who stood to benefit from the complete destruction of the Twin Towers?

40-Why was the debris from the collapsed Twin Towers removed from the site with no forensic examination? Why was almost all of it sold to scrap merchants and shipped abroad where it would not be available for scientific examination?

41-In September the Securities and Exchange Commission initiated an inquiry to establish who benefited from the unusually high numbers of put options purchased prior to September 11 for shares in companies whose stock prices subsequently plummeted, on the supposition that whoever was behind the hijacking was also behind most of the purchases of these put options. Why has this inquiry stalled? Why have those who benefited from the purchases of these put options not been identified (or at least, not publicly)?

42-Why the Video of Building 7 collapsing is being suppressed out of the media?

43-Is it not the case that this atrocity was planned and carried out by elements at high levels of command in the U.S. Air Force, the CIA, the Justice Department and FEMA (possibly with the involvement of well-placed civilians outside the government), acting under orders from, or with the approval of, high officials within the U.S. Administration, and that those same elements are now directing a propaganda campaign against the American people to justify a war of aggression in Asia and the Middle East aimed at controlling the oil and mineral wealth of those regions? And fulfilling a long planed Zionist agenda?

44-Why the U.S. media is ignoring these questions?

45-Why 4000 Israeli worker did not go to work that day?

46-Why all the so-called kidnapped planes could not call for help or report kidnapping? It just takes a second.

47-Why air planes sensors for location were turned of?

48-Could few men from the desert of Afghanistan or Arabia with very limited skills on small airplanes be able to carry out a so sophisticated plot like that?

49-Why the Bush administration invaded Afghanistan before even the investigation began?

50-Is it true that Ben Ladeen” a CIA agent years before?

51- Why they didn’t do anything about his fortune?

52- Why there was a camera watching the fist tower when it got hit? As if they were expecting this.

53- Is it a coincidence that Senator Paul Wellstone, who was resisting the war on Iraq, died mysteriously in an Airplane crash?

54- Why they used the same investigator who investigated the Egyptian airplane which crashed mysteriously in the Atlantic after it took off from New York?

55- On October 31, 1999, Why the Egyptian co-pilot Gamil el-Batouty lost control of his airplane, Egypt Air Flight 990, minutes after it took off from New York airport after it reached 33,000 feet altitude, it went diving, into the ocean, killing him and 217 passengers, including 33 of the top Egyptian army officers, and scientists? Is it the pilot or is it Israeli Mossad?

56- Is it a coincidence that the same Air traffic control that watched over the crash of Egypt Air 990 is the same that watched over the two planes that hit the WTC Towers, flight 11 and flight 175?

57- (JF. Kennedy, Jr., and his wife, Carolyn Bessette got killed in a plane crash, investigators said after they saw his airplane on radar, dive sharply towards the water, that he committed suicide by driving his airplane into the water, killing him self, his wife and his sister-in-law).

The TV, radio, news papers, and all the media, are in their hands. The more you listen, the more you are deceived, the more you watch, the less you know!  A movie director in Hollywood is trained to control your feelings when you watch a movie, they can make you cheerful or sad, scared or exited, they can make you love a devil and view him as a hero, and it can make you hate a guardian angel and see him as a hated devil! All the director wants, is to be given the stage and then it’s very important to turn off the light, and “WO” to any body attempts to turn on the light. Events on the stages of news and media, are directed and controlled by a very professional directors (conspiracy designer) such as Henry Kissinger and James Baker.

Iraq is the gate to the new satanic order:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) White House July 13, 2005.

- The husband of a CIA agent whose identity was revealed amid debate over the Iraq war accused the White House on Thursday of being involved in a giant "cover-up" in the scandal and said President Bush should fire his top aide Karl Rove. "There's been a web of lies that underpin the justification for going to war in Iraq," said Wilson, who worked for the first Bush administration. (Larry Downing/Reuters)

The Iraq wars in 1990 and 2003, that they themselves orchestrated, and preformed with all the actors in this game, one of which is Bush and Blair, will give birth to a new ‘free Iraq”, and that freedom is yet to come!

 Donald Rumsfeld shakes hands with Saddam (20 Dec. 1983)

In a declassified documents include the briefing materials and diplomatic reporting on two Rumsfeld trips to Baghdad. A U.S. cable recording the December 20, 1983 conversation between Donald Rumsfeld and Saddam Hussein. Although Rumsfeld said during a September 21, 2002 CNN interview, "In that visit, I cautioned him about the use of chemical weapons, as a matter of fact, and discussed a host of other things," the document indicates there was no mention of chemical weapons in his meeting with Saddam Hussein.

- After David Kelly of England said there is no weapon of mass destruction he was killed. The so called ‘investigators’ said, it was a Suicide! Is that a couisedance?

President George H. W. Bush Addresses the Nation On Kuwaiti Invasion", August 17, 1991.

"This invasion shall not stand, for it threatens the New World Order." First, this term, "New World Order" was a secret society term, and had been kept very private and very much out of the public eye. The last time a major politician proclaimed this term was when Adolph Hitler was running for office in the late 1920's and early 1930's. in 1991, said that the occult definition of New World Order is "The Kingdom of the New Age Christ". Hitler thought he was that Christ, and he and his fellow Satanists at the Thule Society regularly held rituals in which they called forth the Spirit of Lucifer (Satin) into him. The Thule Society which trained Hitler in the deepest and darkest knowledge of Satanism was a Brotherhood of Death Society, the same global group to which Skull and Bones belonged. And, President Bush Senior was a lifelong adept of Skull and Bones; and so is our current President, George W. Bush. For more details of this link between Hitler's secret society and the Bush's read Cooper, Behold A Pale Horse]. Secondly, President Bush, Senior used a present tense verb in this sentence, rather than a future tense. Bush did not say, "will threaten the New World Order"; rather, he said it "threatens" the New World Order. In other words, Bush was telling us that the New World Order already existed in 1991, and was threatened by the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait!

The making of the new world order.

Those who bang the drums of war, have they ever wandered that they are at the wrong side?

Tom Brokaw announced on October 11, 2001, that the attacks of September 11 had propelled the world into the New World Order

To justify launching World War II Hitler, managed to get his own city hall burned up, of course he have to blame it on the “So called the enemy”.

52- Why there was a camera watching the fist tower when it got hit? As if they were expecting this.

53- Is it a coincidence that Senator Paul Wellstone, who was resisting the war on Iraq, died mysteriously in an Airplane crash?

54- Why they used the same investigator who investigated the Egyptian airplane which crashed mysteriously in the Atlantic after it took off from New York?

55- On October 31, 1999, Why the Egyptian co-pilot Gamil el-Batouty lost control of his airplane, Egypt Air Flight 990, minutes after it took off from New York airport after it reached 33,000 feet altitude, it went diving, into the ocean, killing him and 217 passengers, including 33 of the top Egyptian army officers? Is it the pilot or is it Israeli Mossad?

56- Is it a coincidence that the same Air traffic control that watched over the crash of Egypt Air 990 is the same that watched over the two planes that hit the WTC Towers, flight 11 and flight 175?

57- (JF. Kennedy, Jr., and his wife, Carolyn Bessette got killed in a plane crash, investigators said after they saw his airplane on radar, dive sharply towards the water, that he committed suicide by driving his airplane into the water, killing him self, his wife and his sister-in-law).

The WTC attacks on 9/11 NO SUICIDE PILOTS.

-There were no "suicide" pilots on those September 11 jets. The jets were controlled by advanced robotics and remote-control technology, no hijackers.?

Making robot/remote-controlled jet plane, is an old Game. In the late eighties, Russia with its basic technology, were able to remotely fly a space shuttle -similar to the US shuttle- unmanned! Then land it, safely remotely, without pilots. So, like wise the CIA and the Israeli Mossad with their advance technology can easily do it!

The Northrop Grumman Global Hawk is a robotized an American military jet that has a wingspan of a Boeing 737. An article entitled: "Robot plane flies Pacific unmanned," which appeared in the April 24, 2001 edition of Britain's International Television News:

"'The aircraft essentially flies itself, right from takeoff, right through to landing, and even taxiing off the runway,' according to the Global Hawk's Australian manager Rod Smith. "A robot plane has made aviation history by becoming the first unmanned aircraft to fly across the Pacific Ocean. "The American high-altitude Global Hawk spy plane flew across the ocean to Australia, defense officials confirmed. "The Global Hawk, a jet- powered aircraft with a wingspan equivalent to a Boeing 737 [NOTE: two of the aircraft involved in the 911 crashes were Boeing 757s, two were Boeing 767s] flew from Edwards Air Force Base in California and landed late on Monday at the Royal Australian Air Force base at Edinburgh, in South Australia state.

"It flies along a pre-programmed flight path, but a pilot monitors the aircraft during its flight via a sensor suite which provides infra-red and visual images."

Then, on September 20, 2001, The Economist published comments from a former president of British Airways, Robert Ayling: "On autopilot into the future" "Robert Ayling, a former boss of British Airways, suggested in the Financial Times this week that aircraft could be commandeered from the ground and controlled remotely in the event of a hijack. .."

Would the CIA and its allies the Israeli Mossad conspire to attack America!?

The Army's School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS )thinks Israel is capable of doing exactly that.

 On September 10, 2001, The Washington Times ran a front page story which quoted SAMS officers: "Of the Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service, the SAMS officers say: ' Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target US forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act.'" ("US troops would enforce peace under Army study," Washington Times, Sept.. 10, 2001, pg. A1, 9.) Just 24 hours after this story appeared, the Pentagon was hit and the Arabs were being blamed. These SAMS officers are obviously interested in protecting their country, but not all Americans are. Some are traitors and pay allegiance to Israel. Recall the June 8, 1967, Israeli attack on the USS Liberty, and American complicity in the attack. During the Six Day War, the Liberty, an American intelligence gathering ship, was sailing in international waters. Israeli aircraft and torpedo boats attacked it for 75 minutes. http://ennes.org/jim/ussliberty. When four US fighter jets from a nearby aircraft carrier came to protect the Liberty, US Defense Secretary Robert McNamara ordered the jets NOT to come to the Liberty's aid, and allowed the Israeli attack to continue. Thirty-four Americans were killed and 171 wounded. http://ennes.org/jim/ussliberty/chapter6.htm

Operation Northwoods
1962 Pentagon plan to attack US civilians that would be blamed on Castro's Cuba to "justify" US invasion.

Pentagon Proposed Pretexts for Cuba Invasion in 1962

In his new exposé of the National Security Agency entitled Body of Secrets, author James Bamford highlights a set of proposals on Cuba by the Joint Chiefs of Staff codenamed OPERATION NORTHWOODS. This document, titled “Justification for U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba” was provided by the JCS to Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara on March 13, 1962, as the key component of Northwood. Written in response to a request from the Chief of the Cuba Project, Col. Edward Lansdale, the Top Secret memorandum describes U.S. plans to covertly engineer various pretexts that would justify a U.S. invasion of Cuba. These proposals - part of a secret anti-Castro program known as Operation Mongoose - included staging the assassinations of Cubans living in the United States, developing a fake “Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington,” including “sinking a boatload of Cuban refugees (real or simulated),” faking a Cuban air force attack on a civilian jetliner, and concocting a “Remember the Maine” incident by blowing up a U.S. ship in Cuban waters and then blaming the incident on Cuban sabotage. Bamford himself writes that Operation Northwoods “may be the most corrupt plan ever created by the U.S. government.”

Information on Operation Northwoods can be found in James Bamford's "Body of Secrets," (Doubleday, 2001).

In other words, US allies and people within the US military establishment are not opposed to killing American servicemen and civilians, given the right goal.

The bogus 9/11 hijacking!  

Put yourself in the shoes of the so called, “Operation 911 masterminds”. The attacks had to be tightly coordinated. Four jets took off within 15 minutes of each other at Boston, Dulles, and Newark airports, and roughly two hours later, it was over. The masterminds couldn't afford to take needless chances. Knowing the unpredictable nature of human behavior, when attacked, surely the devils who stand behind this massacre must have known the same truth. Yet we are asked to believe that the culprits took four jet airliners, with four sets of crew and four sets of passengers -- armed with (depending on the news reports you read) "knives," "plastic knives" and box cutters. Given the crazy and unpredictable nature of humans, why would they try this bold plan when they were so poorly armed? A lady's handbag is a stronger weapon than these so called weapons of the hijackers. many ladies have used their hand bags in self defense. Are we to believe that none of the women had the testosterone to knock those flimsy little weapons out of the hijackers' hands? And what of the briefcases most men carry? Thrown, those briefcase can be potent weapons. Your ordinary every-day New York mugger would never take the chances that those so called hijackers took. Flight attendant Michelle Heidenberger was on board Flight 77. She had been "trained to handle a hijacking. She knew not to let anyone in the cockpit. She knew to tell the hijacker that she didn't have a key and would have to call the pilots. None of her training mattered." (Washington Post, "On flight 77: 'Our Plane Is Being Hijacked." September 12, 2001, pgs. A 1, 11.) That's right, The Washington Post for once is telling some of the truth.

The masterminds of Operation 911 knew that whatever happened aboard those flights, the control of the planes was in their hands. Even if the crew and passengers fought back, the hypothesis is that they *could not* have regained control of the planes, for the planes were being controlled by Global Hawk technology.

Flight 77: "The Plane Was Flown With Extraordinary Skill" Once again: Operation 911 demanded that the attacks be tightly coordinated. Four jets took off within 15 minutes of each other at Boston, Dulles, and Newark airports, and roughly two hours later, it was over. If we are to believe the story we are being told, the masterminds needed, at an absolute minimum, pilots who could actually fly the planes and who could arrive at the right place at the right time. American Airlines Flight 77, Boeing 757, took off from Dulles Airport in Northern Virginia at 8:10 a.m. and crashed into the Pentagon at 9:40 a.m. The Washington Post's September 12 says this: "Aviation sources said that the plane was flown with extraordinary skill, making it highly likely that a trained pilot was at the helm, possibly one of the hijackers. Someone even knew how to turn off the transponder, a move that is considerably less than obvious." According to the article, the air traffic controllers "had time to warn the White House that the jet was aimed directly at the president's mansion and was traveling at a gut-wrenching speed--full throttle.” But just as the plane seemed to be on a suicide mission into the White House, the unidentified pilot executed a spin around so tight that it reminded observers of a fighter jet maneuver. The plane circled 270 degrees from the right to approach the Pentagon from the west, whereupon Flight 77 fell below radar level, vanishing from controller's screens, the sources said," (pg. 11). (Washington Post, September 12, 2001, "On Flight 77: 'Our Plane Is Being Hijacked., pgs. 1 & 11. ) maneuvering a Boeing 757 into a 270 degree turn under tense conditions demanded the skill of a fighter pilot. But why would those so called bad, bad, Muslims want to do such a thing? By shifting the plane's position so radically, Flight 77 managed to hit the mostly vacant side of the Pentagon *directly opposite* the side on which the offices of the Secretary of Defense and Joint Chief of Staff were located. (Coincidentally, Flight 77 hit the offices of Army operations (U.S. News an World Report, Sept. 14, 2001, pg. 25). Recall, it was the Army that warned of the possibility that Israel's Mossad might make a terror attack against the US.) The masterminds of Operation 911 were prepared to sacrifice the rank and file, but carefully avoided touching a hair on the head of the brass. It reminds one of Operation Northwoods, doesn't it? Remember the rank and file sailors who were to be sacrificed on a US Naval vessel in Guantanamo Bay, in order to justify war with Cuba? No, neither Hanjour nor any other Muslim suicide pilot was at the controls of this plane. It had been fitted with Global Hawk technology and was being remotely controlled.

 The Other so called hijackers:

Missing: Air Traffic Control Conversations

Now, let's look at the contemporaneous media coverage of Operation 911. Did you notice that during the event and two years after, we heard no excerpts from the conversations between the air traffic control centers and the pilots of the four aircraft? Those conversations are recorded by the air traffic control centers. Surely those conversations were newsworthy. They should have been available to the media immediately. Why didn't we hear them? I believe the answer to this question is simple:

If we could hear the conversations that took place, we would hear the airline pilots telling air traffic control that the controls of their airplanes would not respond. The pilots, of course, would have no way of knowing that their craft had been fitted with Global Hawk technology programmed to take over their planes. But no, we MUST believe the crashes were the work of Muslim terrorists. Therefore we were not permitted to hear the news as it happened. We will have to wait for the FBI/military intelligence people to cook up doctored and fictional conversations. They will then serve them to the public through the complicities mass media and strategically placed "investigative reporters," and we will be asked to swallow them. Many will.

Airlines cooperated and did whatever the FBI told them to do is no secret. The Washington Post of September 12, 2001, says this:
"Details about who was on Flight 77, when it took off and what happened on board were tightly held by airline, airport and security officials last night. All said that the FBI had asked them not to divulge details." Think back to Operation Northwoods in which the Pentagon considered reporting a bogus passenger airplane being shot down by a non-existent Cuban fighter jet. The Pentagon was obviously confident that some airline would go along with the deception. Not surprising, considering many commercial airline pilots and executives are former military pilots, and the government controls the airline industry in many ways. These pilots and executives were trained to do as they are told, and would be out of a job if they broke the rules. Why would the take-off time and the passenger list be held secret? The passengers, crew, and culprits were all dead. The relatives must have known that when they heard the news of the crashes. Flight departure and arrival times had been public knowledge. The masterminds knew the details of their own plans. No, it was the PUBLIC that was being denied information, and the significant information being denied was the conversations between the air traffic controllers and the pilots. Recall that during the Vietnam War, the US "secretly" bombed Cambodia. The bombing was no secret to the Cambodians. It was only a secret from the American public, who were paying for the war and may have objected to the slaughter. And that's the only purpose of the Operation 911 secrecy is To keep the information from the public.

Communication With Flight 11

American Airlines Flight 11, a Boeing 767, left Boston at 7:59 a.m. on its way to Los Angeles. "Boston airport officials said they did not spot the plane's course until it had crashed, and said the control tower had no unusual communications with the pilots or any crew member." (Washington Post, September 12, 2001, "At Logan Airport, Nobody Saw Plane's Sharp Turn South," pg. A 10.) Sorry, this report is not credible. Airplanes are tracked constantly. The skies over the US are far too busy for us to have an apathetic attitude, and wasn’t ever in history an hijacking without the pilot reporting some kind of stress call. Any way "All of it supposedly have been recorded by a Federal Aviation Administration traffic control center. Those tapes are now presumed to be in the hands of federal law-enforcement officials, who arrived at the flight-control facility minutes after Flight 11 crashed into the World Trade Center.
The tapes presumably could provide clues about the hijackers – and may become even more important if the plane's 'black boxes' are damaged or never found." ("Controllers' tale of Flight 11," The Christian Science Monitor, September 13, 2001.)

So, yes, the same "federal law-enforcement" machinery that cooked up the David Koresh negotiation tapes and arranged to destroy the evidence at the Mt. Carmel Center in the April 19 inferno will be handling these records, too.

Flight 175 -- The Washington Post reported a similar story for United Airlines Flight 175, which crashed into the south tower of the World Trade Center tower at 9:06 a.m. "Less than 30 minutes into a journey that was to have taken six hours, Flight 175 took a sharp turn south into central New Jersey, near Trenton, an unusual diversion for a plane heading west, airline employees said. It then headed directly toward Manhattan. "Somewhere between Philadelphia and Newark--less than 90 minutes from Manhattan--the aircraft made its final radar contact, according to a statement released by United Airlines," (Washington Post, "'Everything Seemed Normal When They Left' Boston Airport," September 12, 2001, pg. A10.) Once again, there was no simultaneous, detailed, first hand information from the air traffic controllers about communication from the air traffic controllers. Of course the controls would not respond to manual directions if they were under the control of Global Hawk.
Flight 11/Flight 175 -- Hijacker Passport Found. We have just mentioned the distinct possibility that the masterminds of Operation 911 will manufacture evidence. Well, here is a CNN story for your consideration:
In New York, several blocks from the ruins of the World Trade Center, a passport authorities said belonged to one of the hijackers was discovered a few days ago, according to city Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik. That has prompted the FBI and police to widen the search area beyond the immediate crash site

We are asked to believe that one of the hijackers brought his passport with him on a domestic fight, even though he knew he would not need it then, or ever again; that upon impact the passport flew from the hijacker's pocket (or was he holding it in his hands?), that the passport flew out of the aircraft, that it flew out of the burning tower, and that it was carried by the air currents and landed safely, where it could be discovered, several blocks away.

Flight 93

United Airlines Flight 93, a Boeing 757, was scheduled to leave Newark Airport at 8:01 a.m. for San Francisco. We are told it crashed into an abandoned coal mine near Shanksville, Pennsylvania, at 10:37 a.m., one hour and 50 minutes after the first World Trade Center tower was hit.

Without a doubt, Flight 93 was *shot* down. The first TV network reports said exactly that: Flight 93 had been shot down by a military jet. That information even made it into the print media. "Local residents said they had seen a second plane in the area, possibly an F-16 fighter, and burning debris falling from the sky. [FBI Agent] Crowley said investigators had determined that two other planes were nearby but didn't know if either was military. " ("Stories swirl around Pa. crash; black box found," USA Today, September 14, 2001. ) "Pieces of the wreckage have been found as far away as New Baltimore, about eight miles from the crash site. When the eastbound plane crashed, a 9-knot wind was blowing from the southeast, [FBI Agent] Crowley said. ("Bereaved may visit Flight 93 site," Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, Friday, September 14, 2001.) On September 11, "residents and workers at businesses outside Shanksville, Somerset County, reported discovering clothing, books, papers, and what appear to be human remains. Some residents said they collected bags-full of items to be turned over to investigators. Others reported what appeared to be crash debris floating in Indian Lake, nearly six miles from the crash site.

The Washington Post reported that, just as Congressional leaders were discussing shooting the plane down, they learned it had crashed. ("Jetliner Was Diverted Toward Washington Before Crash in Pa," Sept. 12, 2001, pg. A10.) The North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) and the FBI denied that the plane had been shot down. The FBI blamed the spread of debris over an 8-mile area on a 10 mph wind that was blowing at the time. Of the debris, TIME Magazine of September 11 says: "The largest pieces of the plane still extant are barely bigger than a telephone book." (Pages in this edition are not numbered: this quote appears on what should be pg.40). Planes that crash do not disintegrate in this manner. However, the assertion that the hijackers had a bomb on board, and the bomb exploded, might provide an explanation for the disintegration. There is a problem with this story, however: Hijackers who planned to crash the plane into the Capitol would not want, or need, a bomb. In fact, a bomb might be “counterproductive”: Suppose it went off before the plane hit the Capitol? The mission would be ruined. Bringing a bomb on board would greatly increase chances the hijacker who carried the bomb would be detected when boarding. And it's hard to imagine why hijackers would mutilate and dismember passengers with plastic knives and box cutters when they were planning to blow them up, anyway.

 Missing Air Traffic Control Conversations

According to a an ABC news report by Peter Dizikes on September 13: "Federal Aviation Administration data shows Flight 93 followed its normal flight plan until it neared Cleveland, where the plane took a hard turn south. “That marks the point at which the plane must have been hijacked, investigators say. Then it took a turn east." Note that the investigators used the phrase "must have been" hijacked. Didn't they know? Weren't the air traffic controllers in touch with the pilots? But the direction changes with the next paragraph: "ABCTVNEWS has learned that shortly before the plane changed directions, someone in the cockpit radioed in and asked the FAA for a new flight plan, with a final destination of Washington." Now THAT conversation must have been interesting! You can imagine the response of the air traffic controller: "Excuse me? Flight 93, you're in the middle of a scheduled trip to San Francisco, but you're just changed your mind and want to spend the day in Washington? Please explain." According to an MSNBC story of September 22, 2001, Flight 93 was late taking off, and did not make its way down the runway until 8:41 a.m.

 It was aloft for almost two hours, crashing at 10:37 a.m. Making a rough estimate from the distances traveled and the time in the air (see TIME Magazine, September 11, "The Paths of Destruction" ), Flight 93 went off course sometime between 9:45 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. Recall that both towers had been hit by 9:06 a.m., and the New York airports had been closed since 9:17 a.m. It would have been impossible for an air traffic controller on duty between 9:45--10:00 a.m. not to know that commercial air traffic in the US was in a dire emergency from "suicide planes." And now Flight 93 calls in, asking permission to do a U-turn, fly east an hour and a half, and land in Washington DC? ?? What, the pilot was nervous and didn't know there were airports in the Midwest? I'd love to hear the REAL conversation between Flight 93 and the air traffic controllers, wouldn't you? Come to think of it, why would a *hijacker* call in to ask for an OK to change directions?

Conflicting And Unbelievable Reports

The networks dropped the story that Flight 93 had been shot down and now said that Flight 93 passengers called their families and described a hijacking. The hijackers were armed with box razors, and overwhelmed the passengers and crew, and told the passengers they planned to crash into the Capitol in Washington, DC. The hijackers also mutilated and dismembered the passengers, presumably with their plastic knives and box cutters. What a messy job that must have been! We were not told if the hijackers chatted to the passengers about their plans before, after, or while they were committing the mutilation/ dismemberment. (I heard the mutilation/ dismemberment story once while watching network TV coverage. Then the story was dropped.) On the other hand, TIME Magazine reported that one of the passengers called home to say "We have been hijacked. They are being kind: TIME, Sept.24 pg.73

No. Something went wrong with the masterminds' plan. They could not afford to have Flight 93 make a conventional landing and allow the pilots and passengers to talk about their experience. They could not afford to have the "hijackers" survive and the electronic controls of the plane examined. So Flight 93 was shot down.

Who Were Those People, Anyway? Before September 11, the combined forces of US military and domestic intelligence - the CIA, the FBI, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency -- were clueless that such a catastrophic event would occur. Yet a day or so later, the FBI had secured the names and mug shots of each of the 19 hijackers. How did the FBI know who the hijackers were? After all, all the eyewitnesses are dead. How could the FBI distinguish between regular Muslims and hijacker Muslims on those flights? Or did they just go through the passenger lists culling out the Muslim-sounding names and labeling the people bearing those names as hijackers? "You're Muslim so you're a hijacker..." On September 30 I looked at the passenger lists of those four flights. To my surprise, the lists contained none of the hijackers' names. Here are the URLs I checked: http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA11.victims.html }{http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA77.victims.html}{http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA77.victims.html}{"http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua93.victims.html The FBI may be lying, of course, and the airlines telling the truth: Perhaps none of the "hijackers' were passengers on those four planes. If that is true, the airlines are helping the FBI commit a most grievous fraud on the public. What does that say for the airlines' integrity? In either case, we can place little confidence in the veracity of the information in those lists. Names could have been added just as easily as they may have been deleted.

We MUST believe that a man who dresses in sheets lives in a tent or a cave in the middle of nowhere -”USAma bin Ladeen”- was the mastermind. He used his $300 million fortune to pull off Operation 911. Come to think of it, how does the US know the size of his fortune? Does the FBI know his banker? And given that the world's banking system is highly centralized and in the hands of Mr. bin Ladeen's avowed enemies, how could our terrorist tent-dweller have retained his fortune all these years? If Mr. bin Ladeen could have pulled this off in New York, why didn't he pick on his more direct enemy, Israel, and do a 911 on them? Brilliant as Mr. bin Ladeen did he forget to take credit for the attack. Even worse, he forgot to issue any demands. He allowed his operatives to use their Muslim names and leave a clear trail for the FBI to follow. Mr. Atta, was particularly helpful. He kindly left his car at the Boston Airport. Luckily, an unnamed source drew the FBI's attention to this car. According to radio reports, the FBI found a suicide note written in Arabic and a copy of the Koran in the car. Mr. Atta liked to write in Arabic; he wrote a second, long document in that language, which, for some reason, he put in his luggage. Coincidentally, this luggage did not make it to Flight 11, so the FBI found it at the airport. Another lucky break! But why Mr. Atta would take luggage on a suicide mission, then leave it in the car, it has not been explained. The same note was carried by one of the hijackers on Flight 93, and, Mother of Miracles! survived the crash, even though the airplane itself was torn into shards. Mr. Atta sounds like a Jewish lawyer with his wires crossed, exhorting his co-conspirators to remember their wills and reminding them that Mohammed was an "optimist;" exhorting his fellows to "utilize" their few hours left to ask God's forgiveness. God's forgiveness for what? They were about to die martyrs in “the good cause”. ..Sure, we believe every word. We swallow the whole story.

By now lots of people have realized there is something very wrong with the story of Flight 77's crash into the Pentagon.

 After the smoke died down, everyone could see the Pentagon but no one could see the plane. 

We should have seen wing wreckage. But there was none.

The aluminum wings of the plane should have been ripped off and left outside the building. We should have seen wing wreckage. But there was none. The evidence is overwhelming that the "missile" (Rumsfeld's description) which hit the Pentagon, whatever it was, was not a Boeing 757. The official story is a lie. perhaps inside explosives were used at the Pentagon on 9-11. Certainly the damaged section of the building had just been renovated; explosives would have been easy to install.

Dave vonKleist for the Power Hour radio says “the real conspiracy theory that flight 77 hit the pentagon”

The dynamited towers:  why did building 7 collapsed even though it was not hit by an airplane or any thing? Why did the world trade center towers collapsed? The damage for the towers was only to the top floors. And for the second tower actually it was hit on the side and most of the jet fuel got burned in a fire ball out side the towers? Why their was a series of explosions wile it was collapsing? Who was behind demolishing the world trade centers?

Evidence has emerged and experts have gone on record as saying that the collapse of the twin towers may have been due to bombs within the buildings. Firefighters at the scene on the day and witnesses from both within the towers and the surrounding areas have also verified this, claiming that loud explosions were heard before the collapses. Picture evidence suggests that shape or cutter charge explosions can be identified throughout the buildings as they fell. Even the designers of the structures have said they built the towers with the safeguards against a plane collision in mind. Such suggestions and information was promptly ignored by the mainstream media immediately after September 11th. In addition the strange collapse of WTC 7 has never been reported ANYWHERE in the mainstream media. If these suggestions are true then the implications are massive.
Were bombs planted within these buildings to decisively bring them down? Which will provide a more shocking and devastating effect? If so, then how did they get there un-noticed and who set them off?

 FEMA report on WTC 7 collapse
World Trade Center Seven collapsed on September 11, 2001, at 5:20 p.m. There were no known casualties due to this collapse. The performance of WTC 7 is of significant interest because it appears the collapse was due primarily to fire, rather than any impact damage from the collapsing towers. Prior to September 11, 2001, there was little, if any, record of fire-induced collapse of large fire- protected steel buildings.

To suggest that WTC 7 collapsed due to fire damage is quite frankly absurd. Just look at the way the building collapses. For this building to collapse in this fashion, ALL of the load bearing supports would have had to fail (or be cut) at EXACTLY THE SAME TIME. looking at the video of the WTC7 "collapse" we fiend some interesting things in the pictures. puffs of smoke coming out of the upper floors. The puffs appear to come out of the columns. My guess is the columns were kind enough to destroy themselves to prevent the building from falling outward towards the building across the street!!!! How nifty!!
The claim that the collapse was the result of a fire requires the fire be equally distributed throughout the entire floor of the building, providing equal heat for an equal amount of time, so that all the load bearings members would fail at the exact same moment. How convenient.

The editor of Fire engineering magazine was so disgusted with the investigation said in the January 2002 issue said that the investigation that FEMA conducted is ”a half baked Farce ( Mockery )”

Why did they shipped and soled the remains of the buildings to a foreign countries as scrap metals while these are considered as crime evidence? Why they destroyed the rest of the rubles of those buildings?

-*- In a speach G. W. Bush joked about a question that he was asked in Chicago in regard to the budget, he said, " I was asked, Is there ever any time where the budget might have to go into deficit? I said only if we were at war, or had a national emergency, or were in recession. (laughter) Little did I realize we'd get the TRIFECTA. (Laughter)"

When the families of the victims demanded an independent investigation, of the attack on the W.T.C, Bush refused in the beginning! But he couldn’t stand the pressure. But when he reialized that he have to do somthoing to keep them quiet, he went and hired Henry Kissinger to do the so called independent investigation, and he said,“ Henry Kissinger and I, share the same commitments”, but he didn’t say what kind of commitments, is it the Zionist’s commitment.

THE RUSSIANS KNEW AHEAD OF TIME

"Russian press accounts and other activities by the Russian government this summer indicate that the Russian knew in advance that something would happen to America, including a 'financial attack' against the U.S. During the past three months, Russian media and officials have encouraged citizens to cash out of U.S. dollars pending an economic collapse there after an 'attack'. “Russian official newspapers have been urging their citizens since July, 2001, to cash out their American dollars because of a coming "financial attack" in America!

"a senior research fellow in the Institute of Macroeconomic Researches subordinated to Russian Ministry of Economic Development (Minekonom)." Dr. Koryagina he said, "Besides bombs and missiles, there are other kinds of weaponry, much more destructive ones.. . . The U.S. is engaged in a mortal economic game … There is a shadow economy, shadow politics and also a shadow history, known to cosmetologists (knolidge of the Superficial world). There are “unseen” forces acting in the world, unstoppable for “the most powerful” countries and even continents. There are international, 'super-state' and 'super-government' groups. In accordance with tradition, the mystical and religious components play extremely important roles in human history. One must take into account the shadow economy, shadow politics and the religious component, while predicting the development of the present financial situation. Shadow financial activities of $300 trillion are hanging over the planet. At any moment, they could fall on any stock exchange and cause panic and crash." [Ibid.; Emphasis added Dr. Koryagina continues with her revelation and her validation of such "cosmetologists as this ministry: "The U.S. has been chosen as the object of financial attack because the financial center of the planet is located there. The effect will be maximal. The strike waves of economic crisis will spread over the planet instantly, and will remind us of the blast of a huge nuclear bomb. Thus, in early July, 2001, Ms Koryagina told the world that huge "shadowy" and "unseen " conspiratorial forces in America were about to unleash a "financial attack" on their own country.

The deceiving video tapes:-

Just before the election of 2004, Ben Ladeen made a tape that had a very strong effect on the out come of the election in favor of Bush, which indicates that he is working with them, but what about the tape that was produced during the war of Afghanistan 2001.

The Mystery of the Tape of “USAma Ben Ladeen”.

  Why Ben Ladeen” took responsibility for something that he couldn't possibly do? knowing that it will bring Afghanistan and his people a complete destruction!
According to administration officials, the mystery tape was discovered at an abandoned house in Jalalabad. The tape was allegedly shot November 9th by an unnamed amateur. The administration has reportedly spent at least two weeks Producing translations and subtitles to the video, with a conveniently poor sound and picture. It features bin Ladeen” at an al Qaeda dinner, chatting about the 9/11 attacks with a paraplegic Saudi cleric, identified as Sheik Ali Said al-Ghamdi, Ayman al-Zawahiri is also present, he was engaged in eating.

 A few simple questions regarding the videotape:
* Who shot the footage and Why was the tape made?
* When was it shot?
* Who found the tape and under what circumstances was it found?
* Were the people who found the tape the same people who shot it?
* Were intelligence agencies involved with the creation and delivery of the tape?

* Why does bin Ladeen” appear to be completely oblivious to a 'cameraman' shooting him?
* Would a terrorist mastermind who has eluded the world and who is reported to be a master of concealing his whereabouts, who reportedly does not sleep in the same place twice, allow himself to be shot on videotape blabbing about a huge operation?
* Would a terrorist mastermind ever give operational details of a terrorist operation, and name names, for a camcorder, or in any form traceable to him?
* Would a master terrorist, allow this tape to be left behind in an abandoned house?

With all the superiority in movie making, why they made a tape so obviously fake?

The name Ladeen in Arabic means NO Religion. 

King David hotel and Bagin the master mind.

The King David Hotel housed the Secretariat of the Government...and Headquarters of the British Forces in Palestine....a British officer became suspicious a shootout took place and the Argon [Israeli terrorists] lit the fuses and fled. The explosion destroyed part of the hotel and killed 91... Most...were British but 15...Jews also died, proving that radical Zionists are capable of even killing fellow Jews in order to advance their cause".

The Argon terror gang also targeted Arab civilians in order to frighten them into evacuating their land. The most well known of these massacres happened at the village of Deir Yassin on the morning of April 9, 1948.

More than 100 Arabs, including women and children were systematically slaughtered by Menachem Begin's murderous gang. 24 The Israelis took over whatever villages the terrorized Arabs fled from.

The massacres of Sabra and Shateela:

On 1982 Ariel Sharon lead the Israeli forces on a satanic invasion of Lebanon, in that invasion he conducted many massacres totaled more than 70 thousands human beings, most of them civilians of men, women and children, one of the largest was the massacre of Sabra and Shateela in the capital Beirut.

 The deference on this massacre, is that it was targeted to frame American and Christian people in the responsibility of this massacre, where more than 4,000 people got massacred in one night.

After 70 days and nights of bombing the city of Beirut, the Israeli forces couldn’t enter the city. So, they used a trick as usual, which was, to guarantee the safety of the Palestinians, if they agreed to leave peacefully, but the Palestinians will not agree to that, until they get the guarantees of the safety of the Palestinians civilians when they leave, so they got the guarantees from the French, Italian and the United States of America, which was under Reagan and vice president George Bush. So, US send its troops, Italy and France also. But after the Palestinians pulled out of the city of Beirut, the US and Italians and French pulled out too, to clear the way for Sharon, so they went inside and killed many people and took over the city and the two refugee camps, Sabra and Shatela, where they conducted one of the worlds worst massacres, killing and maiming all its inhabitance, then destroyed the refugee camp on top of the dead, then when they asked Sharon, he said, the Lebanese Christian mercenaries in his ranks did it, but at the wake of this massacre, Palestinians, Arabs and Muslims palmed the US and the Christian world, and Sharon was counting on the Muslim world to take their revenge on the Christian world and America, and that’s exactly what Sharon and Israel wants the most.

Massacres of Sharon, (Election Poster 4/2001,"The finger is very visible for those who have eyes?"), 2004 The killing of the paralyzed sheik Ahmad Yaseen, and Gaza massacres, hundreds dead, and hundreds of houses demolished…

2002, Massacre of Jenin and west bank, hundreds dead. 1982 Invasion of Lebanon, 50,000 dead. Sabra & Shatela massacre 4,000 dead.

1956 Sinai Killing of POWs, …1953 Qibya massacre.

"In 1989, the [Mossad] once again succeeded in framing Arabs... Former Mossad case officer Victor Ostrosvky became so disgusted with the criminal behavior of his own government that he defected...and tried to warn America... Ostrovsky revealed exactly how the Israelis framed Libya for the bombing of a German night club, which killed US servicemen. It was this frame up job that caused President Reagan to bomb Libya, killing the 4 year old daughter of Libyan leader Muamar Qadaffi. France refused to allow US bombers to fly over their air space and bomb Libya because French intelligence knew that Libya was unjustly framed by the [Israeli Mossad]. Among...Ostrovosky's...revelations are: that the Mossad often uses Arab agents to carry out missions, that Israeli agents are skilled at impersonating Arabs, that Mossad had a plan to turn American public opinion against Iraq, and that wealthy Zionists in America are often called upon to help carry out Mossad missions. Ostrovsky's tell all book By Way of Deception infuriated the Mossad and made him the target of numerous death threats."

"In April 1996 the Israelis attacked a U.N. refugee camp in Qana, Lebanon and killed 103 innocent men, women, and...children. A U.N. investigation determined [it] was intentional.., the U.N. Security Council voted to condemn Israel for the attack, and all nations -- with the exception of the U.S. -- voted in favor of the resolution. In other words...slaughtering 103 civilians was not sufficient for the USA to condemn Israel..."

 On September 10, 2001, the Washington Times quoted School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS) opinions of the Israeli Intelligence Service Mossad: "Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target US forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act." 911 occurred a day later and Arabs were blamed

Former Top German Spy Says U.S. Wrong About September 11. "...von Bülow...believes that
the Israeli Mossad is behind the Sept. 11 attacks"

- "Two Israeli Mossad were arrested inside the Palacio Legislativo de San Lázaro (Mexican Congress) in Mexico City -- armed with 9 mm automatics, grenades, electrical wiring, and other bomb related materials -- but were released following intense pressure from the Israeli Embassy. The 2 Zionist terrorists were going to blow up the Mexican Congress [then] mobilize the Mexican, and US press to blame “USAma bin Ladeen..."

When Sharon arrived at the white house G. W. Bush said,” I do believe Ariel Sharon is a man of peace."

"Why does the US, which is trillions of dollars in debt, gives away billons of taxpayer dollars to a foreign government whose military violates international laws and whose MOSSAD is capable of murdering US troops [and civilian men, women, and children who get in the way]...TO FRAME ARABS?"

25 July 2002 - "Israeli government and military

16 March 2003:-23 year old Rachel Corey from the state of Washington, was killed while she was trying to prevent an Israeli army bulldozers from destroying a Palestinian home.

Other foreigners were with her said, “the driver of the bulldozer pushed her to the ground where it proceeded to drive over her arms legs and skull.”

Lyndon Johnson ordered cover-up:

"...during the 1967 Arab, Israeli war, Israeli gunboats and fighter jets deliberately attacked the USS Liberty, an unarmed US communications ship. Thirty-four American sailors were murdered and 170+ others injured in a prolonged [40-minute] Israeli onslaught - carried out in broad daylight and with the U.S. flag flying prominently. The intent was to kill all of the Americans and then leave the Egyptians to take the blame. Israel denied that the attack was deliberate but the chilling stories of...American survivors...contradicts that lie.

 Until this very day, the U.S. Congress has never investigated the USS Liberty massacre... The ship's crew is bitter...because its own country turned its back on them...because someone killed 34 Americans and...their own government covered up the truth and HELPED them get away with it! What was most treacherous though was...President Johnson's ordering the recall of the sixth fleet when he found out the attackers were NOT THE ARABS but the Israelis."

"President Johnson went on television and announced to the American people that TEN sailors were killed in the 'six minute accidental' attack [instead of the 34 sailors who actually died in Israel's INTENTIONAL attack, which lasted more than 40 MINUTES]. Sailors were ordered not to discuss the incident with ANYONE under threat of court-martial. [They] waited for the investigation...the explanations and the answers. Why did Israel attack the ship? Why did the U. S. Government turn its back on the crew..? The answers never came. There has NEVER been a congressional investigation. There HAS been a NAVY-controlled white-washed investigation of the crew's actions during the attack, but Israel's participation was NOT covered."

Probe Of Cover-Up When Zionists Murdered the Crew Of The USS Liberty

A former Navy attorney who helped lead the military investigation of the 1967 Israeli attack on the USS Liberty that killed 34 American servicemen says former President Lyndon Johnson and his defense secretary, Robert McNamara, ordered that the inquiry conclude the incident was an accident.

In a signed affidavit released at a Capitol Hill news conference, retired Capt. Ward Boston said Johnson and McNamara told those heading the Navy's inquiry to "conclude that the attack was a case of 'mistaken identity' despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary."
 It was one of the classic all-American cover-ups, said retired Admiral Thomas Moore, a former Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman who spent a year investigating the attack as part of an independent panel he formed with other former military officials. The panel also included a former US ambassador to Saudi Arabia, James Akins.
Torpedo hole in USS Liberty
 Why would the US government put Israel’s interests ahead of its own? Moorer was the chief of naval operations at the time of the attack.
 Moorer, who has long held that the attack was a deliberate act, wants Congress to investigate.
Israel claims the USS Liberty was mistaken for the out-of-service Egyptian horse carrier El Quseir
According to a 1981 NSA report on the incident, the El Quseir "was approximately one-quarter of the Liberty's tonnage, about one-half its length, and offered a radically different silhouette."
The assault was initiated by French-built high performance Mirage jets armed with cannons and rockets
After the ship was disabled by aircraft cannon, rockets and napalm, Israeli torpedo boats were sent in
Israeli Pilot Admits
USS Liberty Was Intentional
Fifteen years after the attack, an Israeli pilot approached Liberty survivors and then held extensive interviews with former Congressman Paul N. (Pete) McCloskey about his role. According to this senior Israeli lead pilot, he recognized the Liberty as American immediately, so informed his headquarters, and was told to ignore the American flag and continue his attack. He refused to do so and returned to base, where he was arrested.
Later, a dual-citizen Israeli major told survivors that he was in an Israeli war room where he heard that pilot's radio report. The attacking pilots and everyone in the Israeli war room knew that they were attacking an American ship, the major said. He recanted the statement only after he received threatening phone calls from Israel.
The pilot's protests also were heard by radio monitors in the U.S. Embassy in Lebanon. Then-U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon Dwight Porter has confirmed this. Porter told his story to syndicated columnists Rowland Evans and Robert Novak and offered to submit to further questioning by authorities. Unfortunately, no one in the U.S. government has any interest in hearing these first-person accounts of Israeli treachery.
The USS Liberty attack recalled
"Then, inexplicably, at 2 p.m., unmarked Israeli aircraft began attacking the ship."
Israel attacked the USS Liberty using UNMARKED AIRCRAFT. This is the single fact which proves Israel knew exactly who they were attacking. Israel's story is that they thought USS Liberty was an Egyptian ship and therefore a legitimate target of war. Were that true, there would be no reason to attack a supposedly Egyptian ship with unmarked aircraft. The only possible reason to use unmarked aircraft to attack the ship is that Israel knew it was an American ship and intended to sink it, then to blame the attack on Egypt.
Moorer, who as top legal council to the official investigation is in a position to know, agrees that Israel intended to sink the USS Liberty and blame Egypt for it, thus dragging the United States into a war on Israel's behalf. This seems to be a common trick of Israel. Starting with the Lavon affair, through the USS Liberty, to the fake radio transmitter that tricked Reagan into attacking Libya, to potentially 9-11 itself, Israel's game is to frame Arabs and set them up as targets for the United States.
The official US investigation is discredited. And with it, every claim of innocence for Israel that relied on the official investigation as a source.
The real question facing the American people is why the US Government seems more concerned with protecting Israel after they are caught playing these dirty tricks, rather than doing something to convince Israel not to kill any more Americans.

"In 1955, [another] one of these "false flag" operations was publicly exposed for the world to see. Israeli agents impersonating Arab terrorists, were caught staging a series of bombings against American installations in Egypt... It ultimately created such a controversy that it brought down the Israeli government. The long since forgotten scandal became known as the Lavon Affair In 1956., during one of Israel's perpetual wars with its neighbors, the Mossad tried to trick the US into siding with Israel...by blowing up a US facility in Cairo and blaming the Arabs... The plot wrecked when the operatives were caught and confessed, creating a huge scandal. And...the US was tricked into bombing Libya when the Mossad planted a radio transmitter in Tripoli which sent out fake orders to [Arab] terrorists...

USA'S MARCH TO DICTATORSHIP CONTINUES!

Fear is the strongest tool of control, “and the only thing we have to fear, is fear it self”, that’s why they keep using the orange code thing alert thing as the bogey man policy to keep every body in line.

"World War III is coming whether you like it or not... 9/11 was the beginning. .. [Aide Sharon, 4/27/02]. Global plans of the U.S. dictators

President-Elect George W. Bush, “I told all four that there were going to be some times where we don't agree with each other. But that's OK. If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator. CNN News, Aired December 18, 2000 http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0012/18/nd.01.htm

Bush said, 'You are either with us or against us'

CNN, November 6, 2001 Posted: 10:13 p.m. EST (0313 GMT)

Bush said in a Press Conference March 13, 2002, "It's our national interests, it's our national security interests that we have a military tribunal available."

US Newswire, G. W. Bush said, "I understand people's willingness to protest, but they should not protest the decisions our coalition is making, because it is in the best interest of freedom and humankind."

, Or coment next